There are two roulette betting systems that are very popular and similar, the DAlembert and the Martingale strategies.
Both of these gambling systems strictly require players to use Even-Money bets and they’re both trying to achieve the same goal: maximize profits while keeping losses to a minimum and allowing players to win back any losses.
There is, however, one very important distinction between these two, which is perhaps one reason why many roulette players prefer using the DAlembert strategy.
This roulette system requires players to double the amount of their next bet whenever they lose a bet. This is a big problem because players would need to have an unlimited bankroll and play at roulette tables with no betting limits.
The effect of doubling up every time you lose is that the stake amount required to claim back the cash from a losing bet will grow exponentially with every losing bet.
The DAlembert strategy does not have this problem.
In the DAlembert strategy, the amount required to “come back” from a losing bet is only slightly higher than the size of the lost bet. Once you have recovered your money, the bet size begins to decrease by one unit at the time; thus lowering the amount youd need to wager should you lose again.
Lets use another example to compare these two betting systems. Lets assume we use $5 as our base bet (Martingale) or middle number of our sequence (DAlembert) with a total bankroll of $100.
Now, lets assume that we lose four consecutive bets. Under the Martingale system we would have lost a total of $75 or of our bankroll. According to the Martingale progression, we would need to place a bet for $80 to be able to recover our losses but thats already beyond our bankroll limit.
These same four consecutive losses would have costs us only $26 using the DAlembert method – barely one-quarter of our total bankroll and moreover, we could still lose another 4 more bets before we hit our bankroll limit. Its because of this that the DAlembert method is some times preferred over the Martingale method.
The Issue with the DAlembert Strategy
Despite what we have mentioned before, you must note that the DAlembert system is not perfect either. Its very important to mention that this system is based on a gamblers fallacy.
A fundamental element of this strategy is that it assumes that wins are more likely to happen after a loss and vice-versa.
This is very important because the result of one spin is not, in any way, tied up to the outcome of previous spins. Thus each Even-Money bet has exactly the same probability of being Red/Black or Even/Odd.
Regardless of this shortcoming, many players claim this method provides them with a systematic gambling strategy that allows them to achieve good results.
In conclusion, the DAlembert system represents a good opportunity to limit the risk of going Bust while allowing casino players to secure decent profits.
Learn more about how to play roulette for money and don’t forget to visit these No Deposit Bonus Casinos for a chance to win for free.